Ind AS vs IFRS: Every Carve-Out an Indian Finance Team Must Know
- Ind AS is not identical to IFRS — India has carved out or modified several standards, and applying IFRS rules blindly will produce wrong numbers in Indian books.
- The most impactful carve-outs involve hedge accounting, insurance contracts, investment property, and the treatment of foreign currency borrowings.
- Indian companies preparing consolidated statements for global investors must clearly reconcile Ind AS figures to full IFRS, or risk misinterpretation by foreign stakeholders.
- What "Carve-Out" Actually Means
- The Master Carve-Out Table
- Worked Example: The FCY Borrowing Carve-In in Rupees
- Hedge Accounting: Where Ind AS Is Genuinely More Flexible
- Investment Property: Why Indian Real Estate Companies Cannot Mark to Market
- Common Mistakes Finance Teams Make
- How to Stay Compliant in FY 2026-27
Ind AS and IFRS look nearly identical on the surface — same structure, same vocabulary, same conceptual framework. But India has deliberately modified or removed certain IFRS requirements before adopting them as Ind AS. These modifications are called carve-outs (and sometimes carve-ins). If your finance team applies full IFRS rules to Indian books, or vice versa, the resulting financial statements will be materially wrong. This guide walks through every significant carve-out, with plain-English explanations and real numbers, so you know exactly where Indian GAAP diverges from the global standard.
What "Carve-Out" Actually Means
When the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) notified Ind AS under the Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules, each standard went through a review by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI). Where a full IFRS requirement was considered impractical or inappropriate for Indian conditions, the ICAI either removed a paragraph (carve-out) or added an option not available under IFRS (carve-in). The result is a set of standards that is IFRS-converged, not IFRS-compliant. That distinction matters the moment your company seeks a listing on a foreign exchange or raises overseas debt.
The Master Carve-Out Table
The table below summarises the most significant differences for FY 2026-27. Use it as a quick-reference checklist before you close your books.
| Area | Full IFRS Rule | Ind AS Position | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hedge accounting (IAS 39 / Ind AS 39) | Retrospective effectiveness test: 80–125% band is mandatory | Ind AS omits the mandatory retrospective test; only prospective assessment required | More hedges qualify under Ind AS; fewer P&L volatility hits |
| FCY long-term borrowings (Ind AS 21) | All exchange differences on monetary items go to P&L immediately | Carve-in: exchange differences on long-term FCY borrowings related to acquisition of fixed assets can be capitalised to the asset cost | Lower P&L volatility for capital-intensive importers; higher asset base |
| Investment property (Ind AS 40) | Free choice between cost model and fair value model | Only cost model permitted (fair value model is carved out) | Indian property companies cannot show fair value gains in the balance sheet |
| Insurance contracts (Ind AS 104 vs IFRS 4/17) | IFRS 17 (fully effective) requires measurement at current fulfilment cash flows | Ind AS 104 is based on the older IFRS 4; India has not yet adopted IFRS 17 equivalent | Indian insurers' liabilities look very different from global peers |
| Business combinations — pooling (Ind AS 103) | Acquisition method mandatory for all business combinations | Carve-in: pooling-of-interests method permitted for common control transactions | Group restructurings within a conglomerate avoid goodwill recognition |
| First-time adoption — opening balance sheet (Ind AS 101) | Retrospective application with limited exemptions | Additional exemptions available, e.g., deemed cost for PPE using previous GAAP carrying amount | Transition is less disruptive for Indian companies; asset values may differ from IFRS restated figures |
| Statement of cash flows (Ind AS 7) | Bank overdrafts repayable on demand can be netted against cash | Same option exists, but treatment of certain dividends paid differs from common IFRS practice | Minor classification differences in financing vs operating cash flows |
Worked Example: The FCY Borrowing Carve-In in Rupees
This is the carve-out that creates the biggest numerical difference for manufacturing companies. Here is a concrete illustration.
The facts: Precision Tools Ltd. takes a USD 10,00,000 loan on 1 April 2025 to import a machine. The exchange rate on that date is ₹83 per USD, making the INR equivalent ₹8,30,00,000. By 31 March 2026, the rupee has depreciated and the rate is ₹87 per USD. The loan outstanding is still USD 10,00,000.
Step 1 — Calculate the exchange loss:
- Closing liability: USD 10,00,000 × ₹87 = ₹8,70,00,000
- Opening liability: ₹8,30,00,000
- Exchange loss = ₹8,70,00,000 − ₹8,30,00,000 = ₹40,00,000
Under full IFRS: The entire ₹40,00,000 goes to the Profit & Loss account. EBITDA is unaffected but profit before tax drops by ₹40,00,000.
Under Ind AS (with carve-in): Because the borrowing was taken to acquire a fixed asset and the asset is still being constructed or is in use, the company can capitalise the ₹40,00,000 to the cost of the machine. The machine's carrying value increases to ₹8,70,00,000. The P&L is untouched this year. The ₹40,00,000 will instead flow through as higher depreciation over the asset's remaining life.
The bottom line: In FY 2026-27, Ind AS profit is ₹40,00,000 higher than IFRS profit. Over the asset's life the total charge is the same, but the timing is very different. Foreign investors reading an Ind AS P&L without knowing this carve-in will overestimate profitability.
Hedge Accounting: Where Ind AS Is Genuinely More Flexible
Under IAS 39 (which IFRS companies still applying the old standard must follow) and even under IFRS 9's transitional provisions, a retrospective effectiveness test in the 80–125% band was a hard gate. Fail it once and the hedge relationship is discontinued, forcing the entire fair value movement into P&L immediately.
Ind AS 39 removes the mandatory retrospective test. Indian companies only need to demonstrate that the hedge was expected to be effective (prospective). This means an Indian exporter hedging USD receivables has far more room to keep a hedge relationship alive even when market movements push the hedge slightly outside the global corridor. Fewer dedesignations means less P&L noise. For companies that have shifted to Ind AS 109 (the IFRS 9 equivalent), this specific difference narrows, but the transition itself contains carve-ins worth reviewing with your auditor.
Investment Property: Why Indian Real Estate Companies Cannot Mark to Market
A UK or Singapore property fund using full IFRS can elect the fair value model under IAS 40. Every year, independent valuers restate the investment property to market value, and the gain or loss goes directly to P&L. This can make reported profits swing dramatically with property cycles.
Ind AS 40 has carved out this option entirely. Indian companies must use the cost model — depreciate the property and test for impairment. Fair values are disclosed in the notes but never hit the balance sheet. The practical effect: an Indian REIT's reported net asset value will consistently understate the market value of its portfolio compared to a global REIT following full IFRS. Analysts must adjust for this when comparing valuations across borders.
Common Mistakes Finance Teams Make
- Treating Ind AS as full IFRS in group reporting packs: Multinationals that ask their Indian subsidiary to submit IFRS reporting packages sometimes accept Ind AS numbers without adjustment. The FCY borrowing carve-in alone can misstate fixed assets and deferred tax by crores.
- Forgetting to disclose carve-out impacts: SEBI and the MCA expect listed companies to disclose where Ind AS departs from IFRS and quantify the effect. Many companies bury this in a single line note rather than providing a proper reconciliation.
- Applying IFRS 17 logic to Indian insurance subsidiaries: Global treasury teams sometimes model Indian insurance subsidiaries using IFRS 17 assumptions. India still follows Ind AS 104, which is based on IFRS 4. The liability measurement basis is fundamentally different.
- Using the pooling method for transactions that are not common control: The carve-in for pooling-of-interests applies only to common control business combinations. Finance teams sometimes attempt pooling for acquisitions from third parties to avoid recognising goodwill — this is incorrect and will be flagged in audit.
- Ignoring deferred tax consequences of capitalised exchange differences: When you capitalise the FCY exchange loss to an asset under the Ind AS carve-in, the tax base of that asset usually remains at the original cost (since the Income Tax Act does not recognise this capitalisation). This creates a temporary difference and a deferred tax liability that must be recognised under Ind AS 12. Many teams book the capitalisation but forget the deferred tax entry.
How to Stay Compliant in FY 2026-27
Start by mapping every significant foreign currency borrowing, hedge relationship, investment property, and intercompany acquisition in your group. For each item, ask two questions: (1) What does full IFRS require? (2) What has Ind AS carved out or added? Document the difference and its rupee quantum. If you are preparing consolidated statements that will be shared with overseas lenders or investors, prepare a brief carve-out reconciliation note — it takes one extra page but prevents enormous confusion. For teams that want a structured framework to track these adjustments systematically, Ind AS Adjustments on KyaTax provides a step-by-step tool built around the current MCA-notified standards.
Finally, watch the MCA notification calendar. India has signalled intent to converge further with IFRS 17 for insurance and to revisit the investment property carve-out. A standard that is a carve-out today may be eliminated in the next amendment cycle, requiring retrospective restatement.
Do it yourself in minutes — free to try, no login needed.
Open Ind AS Adjustments →Frequently asked questions
Is Ind AS the same as IFRS?
No. Ind AS is IFRS-converged but not IFRS-compliant. India has made specific carve-outs (removals) and carve-ins (additions) to suit Indian legal and economic conditions. Companies reporting under Ind AS cannot claim compliance with full IFRS without a separate reconciliation.
Which carve-out has the biggest financial impact for manufacturing companies?
The foreign currency borrowing carve-in under Ind AS 21 is typically the most material. It allows exchange differences on long-term FCY loans taken for fixed asset acquisition to be capitalised rather than charged to P&L, which can shift crores of losses out of the income statement and into the asset base.
Can an Indian company voluntarily adopt full IFRS instead of Ind AS?
No. Companies incorporated in India that are required to follow Indian Accounting Standards must use MCA-notified Ind AS. Full IFRS is not an option for statutory financial statements in India. However, companies may prepare supplementary IFRS financial statements for foreign investors in addition to their statutory Ind AS statements.
Does the pooling-of-interests carve-in mean goodwill never arises in Indian group restructurings?
Only partly. The pooling method is available solely for business combinations among entities under common control. When an Indian company acquires a third-party business, the acquisition method under Ind AS 103 is mandatory, and goodwill must be recognised and tested for impairment annually — exactly as under full IFRS.
General information for FY 2026-27, not professional advice for your specific case. Rules change — verify against the latest notification or ask a KyaTax expert.
Related: All free tools · More guides · Virtual CFO