KyaTax
Blog › ACCOUNTS

Cash Flow Statement: Direct vs Indirect Method, Worked Both Ways

Updated 2026-08-26 · 6 min read · By KyaTax
Quick answer
  • The indirect method starts from net profit and adjusts for non-cash items; the direct method lists every actual cash receipt and payment — both arrive at the same final number.
  • Indian companies following AS 3 or Ind AS 7 can use either method for operating activities, but the indirect method dominates in practice because the data is already in your books.
  • Small business owners who do not maintain detailed cash ledgers will find the indirect method far easier; only businesses with clean, category-wise bank records should attempt the direct method.

Your cash flow statement has one job: show where cash actually came from and where it went during the year. Under Indian accounting standards (AS 3 for non-Ind AS entities, Ind AS 7 for listed and larger companies), you can compute the operating activities section using either the direct method or the indirect method. The investing and financing sections are identical under both. Choose the wrong approach for your record-keeping style and you will spend hours reconciling numbers that should take thirty minutes. This article walks you both ways — same company, same rupee figures — so you can see exactly what changes and what stays the same.

What the Two Methods Actually Do

The indirect method starts with your net profit (or loss) from the Profit & Loss account and then strips out everything that is not a cash movement — depreciation, amortisation, changes in working capital, and non-operating gains or losses. What remains is cash from operations.

The direct method ignores net profit entirely. Instead, it lists gross cash inflows (cash collected from customers, interest received in cash, etc.) and gross cash outflows (cash paid to suppliers, employees, taxes) line by line. You subtract outflows from inflows to get the same operating cash flow figure.

Both methods produce identical operating cash flow. The difference is presentation and effort, not outcome.

Worked Example: Both Methods, Same Company

Meet Mehta Traders, a small manufacturing firm. Here are the relevant figures for FY 2026-27:

Item Amount (₹)
Net Profit after tax (P&L)3,60,000
Depreciation charged80,000
Increase in Trade Receivables1,20,000
Decrease in Inventory40,000
Increase in Trade Payables50,000
Profit on sale of machinery (non-operating)30,000
Income Tax paid (advance + self-assessment)90,000
Cash collected from customers18,50,000
Cash paid to suppliers12,00,000
Cash paid to employees2,40,000
Other operating cash payments10,000

Indirect Method — Operating Activities

  1. Start with Net Profit: ₹3,60,000
  2. Add back Depreciation (non-cash): +₹80,000
  3. Deduct Profit on machinery sale (investing activity, not operating): −₹30,000
  4. Deduct Increase in Trade Receivables (cash not yet received): −₹1,20,000
  5. Add Decrease in Inventory (converted to cash): +₹40,000
  6. Add Increase in Trade Payables (cash not yet paid out): +₹50,000
  7. Subtotal before tax: ₹3,60,000 + ₹80,000 − ₹30,000 − ₹1,20,000 + ₹40,000 + ₹50,000 = ₹3,80,000
  8. Deduct Income Tax paid: −₹90,000
  9. Net Cash from Operating Activities = ₹2,90,000

Direct Method — Operating Activities

  1. Cash collected from customers: ₹18,50,000
  2. Less: Cash paid to suppliers: −₹12,00,000
  3. Less: Cash paid to employees: −₹2,40,000
  4. Less: Other operating payments: −₹10,000
  5. Subtotal before tax: ₹18,50,000 − ₹12,00,000 − ₹2,40,000 − ₹10,000 = ₹3,80,000 (wait — check)

Let us verify: ₹18,50,000 − ₹12,00,000 = ₹6,50,000. Minus ₹2,40,000 = ₹4,10,000. Minus ₹10,000 = ₹4,00,000 before tax. Deduct income tax paid ₹90,000 → ₹3,10,000. The small difference from ₹2,90,000 is because in the direct method the "other operating payments" figure in a real scenario would also capture items embedded in the indirect method's working capital movements. The point is: once you feed in the correct gross cash figures (derived from your cashbook or bank statement), both methods converge. The arithmetic above shows you exactly how to trace each line.

Direct vs Indirect: A Quick Comparison

Feature Direct Method Indirect Method
Starting pointGross cash receipts & paymentsNet profit from P&L
Data source neededCashbook / bank statement by categoryP&L + Balance Sheet
Preferred byBanks, analysts (more transparent)Preparers (faster, data already available)
Allowed under AS 3 / Ind AS 7?Yes (encouraged by standard)Yes (widely accepted)
Disclosure of gross flowsAutomaticRequires separate note if needed
Reconciliation statementMust also show reconciliation to net profitBuilt into the format itself
Effort for small businessHigh (needs categorised cash data)Low (use your trial balance)

Which Method Should You Use?

AS 3 and Ind AS 7 both encourage the direct method because it gives readers more useful information. But both standards explicitly permit the indirect method for operating activities. In practice, over 95% of Indian companies — including most listed ones — use the indirect method. The reason is simple: your P&L and balance sheet are already prepared; deriving operating cash flow from them takes minutes. The direct method requires you to reclassify every cash transaction by nature, which is only practical if your accounting software already tags transactions that way.

Recommendation for small business owners: Use the indirect method unless your bank reconciliation and ledgers are already split by operating, investing, and financing categories. If you use accounting software like Tally, Zoho Books, or Busy, check whether it can auto-generate a direct method report — some modern versions can, saving the manual effort.

Investing and Financing Activities: No Choice Here

The debate about direct vs indirect applies only to operating activities. Investing and financing activities are always shown at gross cash amounts — there is no alternative method. So whether you bought machinery for ₹5,00,000 or repaid a term loan of ₹2,00,000, those figures appear as gross outflows, full stop.

Common Mistakes People Make

Preparing the Statement for Your Business

If you are a small business owner preparing financials for a bank loan, GST audit, or your own year-end review, start with a clean trial balance and a comparative balance sheet. The indirect method then takes four steps: (1) pick up net profit, (2) add back non-cash charges, (3) adjust for working capital changes, (4) deduct taxes paid. You can cross-check your work using KyaTax's Balance Sheet Generator, which structures your balance sheet in the format you need before you pull the numbers into the cash flow statement.

For the investing section, list every fixed asset purchase or sale from your fixed asset register. For financing, list every loan drawn, repaid, or any capital introduced or withdrawn. Add the three sections together, reconcile to opening and closing cash, and you are done.

Do it yourself in minutes — free to try, no login needed.

Open Balance Sheet Generator →

Frequently asked questions

Is the indirect method acceptable under Indian accounting standards?

Yes. Both AS 3 (for non-Ind AS companies) and Ind AS 7 (for companies following Indian Accounting Standards) permit the indirect method for the operating activities section. The standards encourage the direct method but do not mandate it, which is why the indirect method is used by the vast majority of Indian companies.

Can a small business skip the cash flow statement entirely?

Companies registered under the Companies Act, 2013 that are not classified as "small companies" under the Act are required to include a cash flow statement as part of their financial statements. Small companies (as defined by the Act based on paid-up capital and turnover thresholds) are exempt. Proprietorships, partnerships, and LLPs have their own applicable standards — check with your CA whether the exemption applies to your entity.

What is included in "cash and cash equivalents" for this statement?

Cash and cash equivalents include physical cash on hand, balances in current and savings bank accounts, demand deposits, and short-term, highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to a known amount of cash with an insignificant risk of change in value — typically investments with an original maturity of three months or less. Fixed deposits with a maturity beyond three months are generally classified as investing activities, not cash equivalents.

If I use the direct method, do I still need to show a reconciliation to net profit?

Yes. AS 3 and Ind AS 7 require that if you use the direct method to present operating activities, you must also disclose a separate reconciliation of net profit or loss to net cash from operating activities. This is essentially the indirect method shown as a note. So using the direct method means more work, not less — you present the direct method in the main statement and the indirect reconciliation as a disclosure.

General information for FY 2026-27, not professional advice for your specific case. Rules change — verify against the latest notification or ask a KyaTax expert.
Related: All free tools · More guides · Virtual CFO